Pit bull ban

BSL IS WRONG
Breed specific laws compromise the rights of the law-abiding. Such laws unfairly discriminate against law-abiding owners and non-offending dogs (which represent the VAST majority of all breeds).
Breed specific laws require lay people to make subjective breed identifications, a skill for which they may (or may not) be qualified.
Such laws are expensive to enforce. Some counties, after realizing the staggering expense of maintaining accused dogs until time of trial, law enforcement and administrative costs, have chosen to repeal their breed specific laws. Prince George County in Maryland county spends more than a quarter-million dollars each year to enforce its pit bull ban.
There is no real evidence that breed bans lower the incidence of dog bites.
Breed specific legislation fails to address the real problem: pet owner responsibility.
Breed specific laws cause those who own targeted breeds to hide their dogs, which if anything, worsens the living conditions of the dogs and makes them all the more likely to bite. (Picture dogs who are crated all day long during daylight hours and only allowed to potty or exercise at night.)
No one disputes the tragic consequences of dog attacks. However it is economically irresponsible to enact new legislation when adequate laws are already on the books. If existing leash, licensing and confinement laws are not enforced, what reason is there to think breed ban laws will be?

I have never met an animal that I dislike,however I can not say the same about all humans.

Je signe ,oui c est important surtout qu il ne sont pas dressé. C est le chien qui promène le maître et non l inversé. Se sont des chiens qui doivent être dresser par des professionnelle des militaires puis un passeport obligatoire . Puis que le chien ne promène pas son maître.