For a justice that is finally responsible and humane

Since the launch of the petition AI & Justice, I have received numerous messages, questions, and reactions.

These exchanges reveal two very clear observations:

• many citizens are not yet using artificial intelligence, or very little;
• AI often evokes fear or distrust, mainly due to a lack of concrete understanding.

These reactions are legitimate.
We cannot ask citizens to embrace an evolution of the judicial system if the tool remains vague, abstract, or concerning.

 A simple, clear, and accessible guide

It is for this reason that I have written a pedagogical guide for using artificial intelligence, primarily aimed at people who are:

• not very comfortable with computers,
• who have never used AI,
• or who wish to understand how to use it simply, concretely, and safely.

Specific objective:
to enable every citizen to prepare a clear, structured, and understandable legal or administrative file before submitting it to a lawyer, an administration, or a court.

A program available for free

So that everyone can judge for themselves the value of this approach,
the detailed program of the guide is available for free on Payhip:

 https://payhip.com/charleshenri

It notably helps to understand:

• what AI really is (and what it is not),
• how to communicate simply with it,
• how to structure a chronological file based on facts,
• how to organize and number documents,
• how to save time without replacing the lawyer or the judge,
• how to avoid the most common mistakes.

 For those who wish to go further

A complete guide is available on Payhip to accompany, step by step, citizens who wish to:

• better understand their own situation,
• effectively structure their processes,
• communicate with their lawyer on a clear basis,
• avoid hours of unnecessary work,
• regain control of their file.

As the program is available for free, everyone can decide in complete transparency, without commitment.

 Concrete benefits

A reasonable use of AI allows for:

• a considerable time saving,
• a complete reading of the file (and not partial),
• a better understanding of the issues,
• a common working basis for the citizen and the magistrate,
• a reduction in stress and improvisation.

 AI does not judge.
 It does not replace the lawyer or the magistrate.
It helps to understand, structure, and clarify.

In conclusion

This approach is neither ideological nor technological.
It is pragmatic, pedagogical, and civic-minded.

Before transforming a system, we must allow citizens to understand the tools that can improve it.

You are completely free:

• to consult the program,
• to use or not use the guide,
• to form your own opinion.

Today, who could do without a computer, a phone, or an email account?

Artificial intelligence is an additional step, simpler and more useful than one might think.

Trying is often understanding.

Best regards,
Charles Henri